HAKAMLIK SUDI INSTITUTINING TARIXIY NEGIZI VA NAZARIY-HUQUQIY MOHIYATI
Kalit so‘zlar:
hakamlik sudi, tarixiy negiz, nizolarni hal etish, vakolatli sud, nazariy, huquqiy, qonun, kodeks.Avstrakt
Mamlakatimizda fuqarolik jamiyatini mustahkamlash hamda demokratik islohotlarni yanada chuqurlashtirish sharoitida hakamlik sudlari institutini keng rivojlantirish zaruratga aylanmoqda. Ushbu maqola O‘zbekiston Respublikasida hakamlik sudi institutining tarixiy negizi, vujudga kelish shart-sharoitlari, bu borada olimlar tomonidan ilgari surilgan nazariy tushuncha va tamoyillar hamda hozirgi kundagi huquqiy holati haqidagi ma’lumotlar hamda hakamlik instituti faoliyatiga daxldor taklif va tavsiyalar ishlab chiqishga qaratilgan. Tadqiqot davomida hakamlik sudlarining asosiy funksiyalari, ularni rivojlantirishda qo‘llaniladigan metod va mexanizmlar hamda davlat tomonidan ko‘rilayotgan tashkiliy-huquqiy chora-tadbirlar atroflicha tahlil qilinadi.
##submission.citations##
Otaxonov F.X. Nizolarni muqobil hal qilish – Al’ternativnoye razresheniye sporov [Alternative dispute resolution]. Institute of Legislative Problems and Parliamentary Research under the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan. A collection of articles. 2022, p. 85.
Raxmonqulov X.R., Oqyulov O.O. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik kodeksiga sharh [Commentary on the Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Tashkent, VektorPress publ., 2010.
Maripova S. Fuqarolik protsessida mediatsiyani qoʻllash: qiyosiyhuquqiy tahlil [Application of mediation in civil proceedings: a comparative legal analysis]. PhD thesis. 2022, p. 38.
Nizolarni muqobil hal etish usullari / Darslik. Hammualliflikda. – Toshkent: TDYU, 2024. – 338 bet. Mualliflar: M.M. Mamasiddiqov, yu.f.d. (DSc), professor – I, II, III, IV boblar; A.A. Xakberdiyev, yu.f.d (DSc), dotsent – V, VI, VII, VIII, IX boblar, glossariy, testlar.
Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, Party Autonomy and Case Management Experiences and Suggestions of an Arbitrator, 11 schiedsvz 1, 2 (2013).
Dana H. Freyer, Practical Considerations in Drafting Dispute Resolution Provisions in International Commercial Contracts: A US Perspective, 15(4) J. INT’L ARB. 7, 20-23 (1998).
Alabama claims of the United States of America against Great Britain 1972. Access mode: http://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/ vol_XXIX/125-134.pdf (circulation date: 27 March 2017).
