DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS IN CRYPTO EXCHANGE AGREEMENTS: BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY AND LAW
Ключевые слова:
cryptocurrency dispute resolution, blockchain governance, smart contract arbitration, digital asset regulation, crypto exchange agreements, decentralized finance law, cross-border enforcement, legal technology integration.Аннотация
This study examines the dispute resolution mechanisms employed in cryptocurrency exchange agreements, analyzing their effectiveness in addressing conflicts between users and platforms. Through a comprehensive analysis of 50 major cryptocurrency exchanges' terms of service and a survey of 300 users, this research identifies key challenges and proposes solutions for enhancing dispute resolution in the crypto space. The findings reveal significant gaps between traditional legal frameworks and blockchain technology, highlighting the need for hybrid resolution approaches that combine smart contracts with conventional arbitration methods.
Библиографические ссылки
Bambara, J. J., & Allen, P. R. (2023). Blockchain: A practical guide to developing business, law, and technology solutions. McGraw Hill Professional.
Chohan, U. W. (2023). The FTX collapse and its implications for cryptocurrency regulation. Critical Blockchain Research Initiative, 15(4), 278-295.
Chen, Y., & Bellavitis, C. (2023). Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of decentralized business models. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1), 105970.
Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., & Potts, J. (2023). Economics of blockchain and cryptocurrency. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Feinstein, B. D., & Werbach, K. (2023). The impact of cryptocurrency on law and regulation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17, 31-50.
Finck, M. (2023). Blockchain regulation and governance in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, R. T., Smith, K. L., & Anderson, M. E. (2023). Smart contracts in dispute resolution: A technological perspective. Journal of Legal Technology, 12(3), 145-162.
Kim, S., & Kaal, W. A. (2023). Cryptocurrency regulations: A cross-country analysis. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 54(2), 615-668.
Martinez, E. R., & Wong, C. H. (2023). Enforcement challenges in cryptocurrency disputes. Harvard Business Law Review, 13(1), 89-124.
Park, J. W., Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2023). Jurisdictional issues in cryptocurrency exchange disputes. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 31(2), 167-189.
Rodriguez, M. A. (2023). User protection mechanisms in cryptocurrency exchanges. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 38(1), 1-47.
Thompson, R. B., & Chen, X. (2023). Integrating blockchain technology with traditional legal frameworks. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 25(1), 234-271.
Wilson, M. E. (2023). The evolution of legal systems in the age of blockchain. Stanford Technology Law Review, 26(2), 312-345.
Yeoh, P. (2021). Regulatory issues in blockchain technology. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 29(2), 185-204.
Zhang, H., & Lee, K. (2022). Cross-border coordination in cryptocurrency dispute resolution. International Journal of Law and Technology, 30(4), 456-478.
Zetzsche, D. A., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2023). Decentralized finance and the law. Oxford University Press.
Zhou, W., Barner, K., & Li, Q. (2023). Technical aspects of blockchain-based dispute resolution. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(3), 1123-1138.
Legal Cases and Regulatory Documents:
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc., No. 20 Civ. 10832 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
In re Coinbase Global, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 21 Civ. 3634 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
Abdikhakimov, I. Leveraging Blockchain to Enhance Security and Traceability of Intellectual Property Assets.
Abdikhakimov, I. Legal and Ethical Implications of Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Abdikhakimov, I. Balancing Innovation and Privacy in Artificial Intelligence Technologies.
Abdikhakimov, I. (2024). QUANTUM SUPREMACY: EXPLORING THE DISRUPTIVE POTENTIAL OF QUANTUM COMPUTING ON CRYPTOGRAPHY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORKS FOR DATA SECURITY. science, 2(1).
Abdikhakimov, I. (2024). THE EMERGENCE OF QUANTUM LAW: NAVIGATING THE INTERSECTION OF QUANTUM COMPUTING AND LEGAL THEORY. Elita. uz-Elektron Ilmiy Jurnal, 2(2), 49-63.
Abdikhakimov, I. (2024). Quantum Computing Regulation: a Global Perspective on Balancing Innovation and Security. Journal of Intellectual Property and Human Rights, 3(8), 95-108.
Abdikhakimov, I. (2023). INSURANCE CONTRACTS: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PRINCIPLES, POLICYHOLDER RIGHTS, AND INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS.
Abdikhakimov, I. (2023, November). Superposition of Legal States: Applying Quantum Concepts to the Law. In International Conference on Legal Sciences (Vol. 1, No. 8, pp. 1-9).
Abdikhakimov, I. (2024). QUANTUM SUPREMACY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR BLOCKCHAIN REGULATION AND LEGISLATION. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 4(1), 249-254.
European Union. (2023). Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). Official Journal of the European Union, L 437/1.
Financial Action Task Force. (2023). Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. FATF, Paris.
Industry Reports:
CoinGecko. (2023). Annual Cryptocurrency Report 2023. Singapore: CoinGecko.
Deloitte. (2023). Global Blockchain Survey 2023. Deloitte Insights.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2023). Crypto Hedge Fund Report 2023. PwC Professional Services.
