AI, PIRACY, AND THE DEATH OF OWNERSHIP

Авторы

  • Odilbek Iriskulov Tashkent State University of Law

Ключевые слова:

Artificial Intelligence (AI); Copyright; Piracy; Intellectual Property; Digital Law; Global South; Uzbekistan

Аннотация

The rise of artificial intelligence is forcing a reckoning with the
very foundations of intellectual property law. For centuries, copyright and patent
regimes have relied on the premise of scarcity: that works are original, finite, and
owned by identifiable creators. Yet AI systems undermine these assumptions by
generating infinite outputs at negligible cost, blurring authorship, and accelerating
global access to culture. This article situates the debate historically, showing how
piracy—from 19th-century American publishers pirating Dickens to cassette tape
sharing in the 1980s—has often been a driver of cultural dissemination rather than
mere criminality. Today, in places like Uzbekistan, the reliance on “pirated”
knowledge is not deviance but necessity, enabling students, entrepreneurs, and
creators to participate in global knowledge economies. By analyzing contemporary
legal disputes around AI training data, the EU AI Act, and U.S. copyright
litigation, the paper argues that ownership is being outpaced by technological
reality. Three futures are explored: subscription-based access models, reputation
economies built on trust and attention, and open-source commons as global
infrastructure. Ultimately, the Global South may transition into this post-ownership
world more rapidly than the West, where legal and corporate systems remain
anchored to outdated notions of exclusivity

Скачивания

Данные по скачиваниям пока не доступны.

Биография автора

  • Odilbek Iriskulov, Tashkent State University of Law

    Founder and CEO of OXFORDER LLC 

    Master’s Graduate of the University of Oxford

     Professional Programmer and Data Analyst Lawyer, 

    Professional Mediator, 

    Lecturer at Tashkent State University of Law

     Entrepreneur in the field of LegalTech

Библиографические ссылки

Primary Sources

Cases

Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2021] EWCA Civ 1374 (CA).

New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation and OpenAI, Inc (S.D.N.Y., filed 27 December 2023).

Legislation & Treaties

European Union, Artificial Intelligence Act [Regulation (EU) 2024/1689].

Secondary Sources

·Dickens, Charles, American Notes for General Circulation (Chapman & Hall 1842).

Johns, Adrian, Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates (University of Chicago Press 2010).

Lessig, Lawrence, Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity (Penguin 2004).

Stallman, Richard, Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman (GNU Press 2002).

Strang, Colin, ‘AI and the Question of Authorship’ (2023) Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 36(2) 214.

· Vinck, Patrick, ‘Piracy, Access, and Development in the Global South’ (2021) Journal of Intellectual Property and Development 5(1) 67.

Web Sources

·European Parliament, ‘EU Artificial Intelligence Act: First Regulation on AI’(2024) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20231201STO12304/first-eu-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence

The Guardian, ‘New York Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft over Copyright Infringement’ (27 December 2023) https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/dec/27/new-york-times-sues-openai-microsoft-copyright

WIPO, ‘Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence’ (2022) https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/artificial_intelligence

[1] Dickens’s complaints about piracy in America: The Guardian, “Charles Dickens and the American Pirates” (2012)

[2] U.S. joining Berne Convention in 1989: WIPO – Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works

[3] Cassette tapes as “piracy machines”: RIAA v. Sony Corp. of America (the “Betamax case,” 1984)

[4] Software piracy rates: Business Software Alliance, Global Software Piracy Study (2011)

[5] Sci-Hub and Elbakyan: Nature (2016), “Sci-Hub: Who’s downloading pirated papers?”

[6] U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Thaler v. Perlmutter, 2023. See also NPR, “AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, federal judge says,” Aug. 21, 2023.

[7] New York Times v. OpenAI et al., U.S. District Court (S.D.N.Y.), filed Dec. 27, 2023. Coverage: The New York Times, “The Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft Over Use of Copyrighted Work,” Dec. 27, 2023.

[8] European Parliament, “AI Act: first regulation on artificial intelligence,” adopted March 2024.

[9] Joe Karaganis (ed.), Media Piracy in Emerging Economies, Social Science Research Council, 2011. (Case studies on India, Brazil, Russia).

[10] Jeremy Rifkin, The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Tarcher, 2000

[11] Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, PublicAffairs, 2019

Опубликован

2026-01-26